|
| |
Alternate title:
This woman is crazy!
|
 |
 |
Dear
Bob,
I just returned from 3 1/2 weeks in Ghana, West Africa (country
#7, see map at bottom).
I stayed with a national family who are our friends. The husband
had been in the US for an advanced degree so he understood my
health needs—such
as washing fruit, etc. The family was diligent in supplying
bottled water, washing fruit and vegetables, washing my plate,
utensils, etc.
I
ate the local foods they cooked, which are all boiled, and did
not get sick at any time. One night I felt like I might upchuck,
but I prayed, took ImmunePlus and Total Flora and went to
bed. In the morning I was great. I even survived a meal of rice
and tomato gravy cooked over charcoal in a small jungle village
(photo
above).
Without thinking while in the village, I drank coconut milk from
a fresh coconut. It had just been "peeled" with a machete and
the only bacteria on the outside were from the machete and the
man's hand as he turned the coconut—which
of course was enough bacteria to make me sick without God's
blessing and the nutrition I took.
I took along ImmunePlus, Total Flora Support, Infi-Aid, Echinacea,
Digest-A-Meal, Essentials For Life, B-Complete, Healthy Bones
and Teeth, Essential Fatty Acids, Ginkgo Biloba, and
Lipo-Chromizyme. I forgot the new Natural Potent C, which I
meant to take to help with the high temperatures and high
humidity. I used all the above several times a day and sometimes
during the night, plus I was prepared for an outbreak of malaria
with the
Echinacea
or
for intestinal problems with the Flora Support, and of course,
the ImmunePlus and Infi-Aid for any reason. (I
took 3 bottles of each of these to use as "medicine" should I
become sick.)
I did not use the malaria prescription given to me (drugs
are hard on me), relying only on the
Echinacea. I
took it at least 2 times a day. [This
is Carol's story; EcoQuest/Infinity2 does not advocate that
anyone should go to an area where malaria is prevalent and
depend on nutritional supplements for prevention or care.] Both
my son-in-law and the husband of the host family had previously
had great results using the
Echinacea
when
battling malaria, so I felt comfortable relying only on it. Had
I become ill, I was prepared to immediately give the family
information on what my body will or will not tolerate in case I
became too sick to think.
The
possibility of my becoming sick was a subject of lengthy
discussion in my family before deciding on the trip because I
have only one kidney and it works at 85%. Any illness could be
catastrophic. Both on the
Ghana
trip
and the trip home (5 hours difference), it
was only one day before I was back on schedule. While I am much
more healthy now than ever in my life, I still am not nearly as
strong as many people are. So I am thrilled and ready to take
off again, with the Infinity2 products in tow!
I will be 67 in July.
The real proof of the value of the Infinity2 products was when a
member of the Africian family would come to my room, asking for
"medicine" for stuffiness (ImmunePlus) or
for a headache (Infi-Aid). Each of these
incidents occurred the day following consumption of sodas or
sweets, which are unusual foods for them.
Carol Roth
Jackson, Missouri
More Nutritional and Health Advice from Carol
Thank you for having me on your
morning call.
I hope our people
remember that our bodies are made of water and a broad range of
nutrients, some of which have not yet been identified by
science. We need whole foods and pure water. The pure water is
simple with EcoQuest. The Infinity2 nutrition is readily
available with a monetary expenditure and the effort of
remembering to consume them.
Because our products
are made from whole foods, Infinity2 supplements contain
nutrients science has not yet identified within our food
ingredients. So, we are getting the best of today and
tomorrow. Some of us are afraid of “taking too many”
nutrients. However, we do not stop to consider the daily
emotional and physical trauma of dealing with treatment of
diabetes or for cancer, not even knowing whether we really will
get well.
Using
a great amount of nutrients gives me a sense of freedom every
night when I lay down and every morning when I get up. I will be
67 in July and take no drugs of any kind, either over the
counter or prescription. I have had no drugs except for “colds”
since at least 1970, except for (a) a kidney infection after the
cancer surgery to remove one kidney. I spent one night in the
hospital to prevent possible dehydration; and (b) I was in the
hospital for 3rd degree burns.
My husband, 69, is
on a small dosage blood pressure pill and is currently working
an 8 hour day on construction and then driving the tractor to
cut hay for baling. I give him a lot of nutrition, especially
E3.
We spend a lot of
money on Infinity2 products, $300 to $500 per month. But not
nearly so much as my friends say they pay for their drugs or for
hospital stays. Plus, they stay aggravated about the whole
situation.
Bob, I like our
freedom from illness we currently enjoy and which I expect to
continue.
EcoQuest gives us
financial freedom and “health” freedom.
Carol Roth
|
 |
Testimonial |
Dear Bob,
We had the LaundryPure for 7 months when we took a 10-day trip and I
left a load of towels in the washer, forgetting to tell my son to
move them to the dryer. When I opened the washer after returning
home, there they were! The first thing I did was to pick up a towel
to smell it—no
odor of mildew! I called my husband who has a keen sense of smell—he
also said no odor of mildew. I really do believe in the bacterial
control of the silver ions; however, I yielded to my old instincts
and re-washed the towels just in case I should. I was pleased that I
did not need to discard a whole load of towels due to the usual
growth of mildew after even one day in the washer prior to
installing the LaundryPure.
Carol Roth |
While you are on this page, would you like a short
lesson on current events and genocide?
Editorial comment: As horrific as the situation in
Sudan is, I am not calling for US or UN action there.
Some world situations are beyond the reach of what
America can police or afford. We are a blessed and fortunate nation,
but we do not have enough money, manpower and/or world
political support to do everything. Even when we try, we often fail.
With the best of intentions and with the sacrifice of
young Americans, we were not able to "save" the people in Somolia nor are we
"saving" anyone in Iraq.
|
|
Black Africans say they are being
driven from their homes in Darfur
|
Sudan's government ( see
map: Sudan is below Egypt, which is at the top right)
and pro-government Arab militias have been accused by human rights
groups of carrying out genocide against black African residents of the
Darfur region.
The militia groups, known as the Janjaweed, are accused of forcing
some two million people from their homes and killing thousands.
The United States has also used the term genocide, but a UN
investigation has stopped short of describing the violence in Darfur as
genocide. It concluded that the Sudanese government and allied militias
had committed war crimes against the civilian population. If they had
used the term genocide, it might
then carry a legal obligation to act.
But what is genocide and when can it be applied? Some argue that the
definition is too narrow; others, that the term is devalued by misuse.
UN
definition
The term was coined in 1943 by the Jewish-Polish lawyer Raphael
Lemkin who combined the Greek word "genos" (race or tribe) with the
Latin word "cide" (to kill).
After witnessing the horrors
o f
the Holocaust—in which every member of his family except his brother and
himself was killed—Dr Lemkin campaigned to have genocide recognized as a
crime under international law.
His efforts gave way to the adoption of the UN Convention on Genocide in
December 1948, which came into effect in January 1951. Article Two of
the convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed
with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic,
racial or religious group, such as:
|
 |
"Genocide is...
both the gravest and
greatest of the crimes against humanity."
Alain
Destexhe
|
-
Killing members of the
group
-
Causing serious bodily or
mental harm to members of the group
-
Deliberately inflicting
on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part
-
Imposing measures
intended to prevent births within the group
-
Forcibly transferring
children of the group to another group
The convention also imposes a
general duty on states that are signatories to "prevent and to punish"
genocide. Since its adoption, the UN treaty has come under fire from
different sides, mostly by people frustrated with the difficulty of
applying it to different cases.
'Too narrow'
Some analysts argue that the definition is so narrow that none of the
mass killings perpetrated since the treaty's adoption would fall under
it. The objections most frequently raised include:
- The convention excludes targeted political and social groups
- The definition is limited to direct acts against people, and
excludes acts against the environment which sustains them or their
cultural distinctiveness
- Proving intention beyond reasonable doubt is extremely difficult
- UN member states are hesitant to single out other members or
intervene, as was the case in Rwanda
- There is no body of international law to clarify the parameters
of the convention (though this is changing as UN war crimes
tribunals issue indictments)
- The difficulty of defining or measuring "in part", and
establishing how many deaths equal genocide
But in spite of these criticisms, many say genocide is recognizable.
In his book Rwanda and Genocide in the 20th Century, former
secretary-general of Medecins Sans Frontieres (Doctors Without
Borders), Alain Destexhe says: "Genocide is distinguishable from all
other crimes by the motivation behind it. Genocide is a crime on a
different scale to all other crimes against humanity and implies an
intention to completely exterminate the chosen group. Genocide is
therefore both the gravest and greatest of the crimes against humanity."
Loss of meaning
Mr Destexhe believes the word genocide has fallen victim to "a sort
of verbal inflation, in much the same way as happened with the word
fascist. "Because of that," he says, "the term has progressively lost
its initial meaning and is becoming dangerously commonplace."
The slaughter in Rwanda
shocked the world
|
Michael Ignatieff, director of the Carr Centre for Human
Rights Policy at Harvard, agrees. "Those who should use the word
genocide never let it slip their mouths. Those who unfortunately do use
it, banalise it into a validation of every kind of victimhood," he said
in a lecture about Raphael Lemkin."Slavery for example, is called
genocide when
it was a system to exploit, rather than to exterminate the
living."
The differences over how genocide should be defined, lead also to
disagreement on how many genocides actually occurred during the 20th
Century.
History
Some say there was only one genocide in the last century—the
Holocaust.
Others
give a long list, including the Soviet man-made famine of Ukraine
(1932-33), the Indonesian invasion of East Timor (1975), the Khmer Rouge
killings in Cambodia in the 1970s, the mass killing of Armenians by
Ottoman Turks between 1915-1920
(an accusation the Turks deny), Rwanda, where an estimated
800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus died in 1994 (more than 20 ringleaders
of the this genocide have been convicted by the International Criminal
Tribunal for Rwanda), and of course Former Yugoslav leader Slobodan
Milosevic (photo) was charged with genocide in Bosnia from 1992-95.
The UN panel investigating Darfur concluded that though there was the
deliberate targeting of civilians in Darfur using murder, torture and
sexual violence, the Sudan government had not pursued an intentional
policy of genocide. The panel did not rule out though, that if war
crimes are investigated by the International Criminal Court, as it
recommends, then it may find genocidal acts having been committed in
Darfur and some individuals guilty of having had "genocidal intent." |
|